Hadnott v. Amos

401 U.S. 968, 91 S. Ct. 1189
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided March 22, 1971·No. No. 882·Published·Cited by 14 cases

Opinion

Appeal from D. C. M. D. Ala. Motion to dispense with printing jurisdictional statement and other relief granted. Motion of appellee Hildreth to dispense with printing motion to affirm granted. Judgment affirmed.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and case set for oral argument.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hadnott v. Amos, 401 U.S. 968, 91 S. Ct. 1189 (1971).

401 U.S. 968 (Hadnott v. Amos) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Francis Olinger
759 F.2d 1293 (Seventh Circuit, 1985)
White v. Manchin
318 S.E.2d 470 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1984)
United States v. Marengo County Commission
731 F.2d 1546 (Eleventh Circuit, 1984)
Harris v. Conradi
675 F.2d 1212 (Eleventh Circuit, 1982)
The City of Akron v. Eugene Leonard Bell
660 F.2d 166 (Sixth Circuit, 1981)
Antonio v. Kirkpatrick
453 F. Supp. 1161 (W.D. Missouri, 1978)
Brill v. Carter
455 F. Supp. 172 (D. Maryland, 1978)
Billington v. Hayduk
439 F. Supp. 971 (S.D. New York, 1977)
Russell v. Hathaway
423 F. Supp. 833 (N.D. Texas, 1976)
Phelan v. City of Buffalo
54 A.D.2d 262 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)