Hadnott v. Amos

393 U.S. 996, 89 S. Ct. 489
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hadnott v. Amos. Read the opinion of the Court — 394 U.S. 358
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided December 16, 1968·No. No. 647·Published

Opinion

D. C. M. D. Ala. Motion to dispense with printing jurisdictional statement granted. Probable jurisdiction noted and case set for oral argument on January 21, 1969, together with motion for an order to show cause why Judge Herndon should not be held in contempt and for other relief. Appellants’ briefs shall be filed by January 3, 1969, and responding briefs by January 17, 1969. Case may be presented on original record, without printing.

Mr. Justice Black took no part in the consideration or decision of these matters.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hadnott v. Amos, 393 U.S. 996, 89 S. Ct. 489 (1968).

393 U.S. 996 (Hadnott v. Amos) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.