Habetz v. Cormier

542 So. 2d 819, 1989 La. App. LEXIS 724, 1989 WL 37023
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedApril 19, 1989
DocketNo. 88-21
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 542 So. 2d 819 (Habetz v. Cormier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Habetz v. Cormier, 542 So. 2d 819, 1989 La. App. LEXIS 724, 1989 WL 37023 (La. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

KNOLL, Judge.

For the reasons stated in the companion case of Cormier v. Habetz, 542 So.2d 814 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1989), in which a separate decision is being rendered by us this day, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed in part, reversed in part, amended in part and rendered.

All costs of the trial court and this appeal are assessed one-half to Louis Cormier and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, and one-half to Leonard Habetz and Louisiana Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company.

AFFIRMED IN PART, AMENDED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, AND RENDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cormier v. Habetz
542 So. 2d 814 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
542 So. 2d 819, 1989 La. App. LEXIS 724, 1989 WL 37023, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/habetz-v-cormier-lactapp-1989.