Habetz v. Cormier

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Habetz v. Cormier

542 So. 2d 819, 1989 La. App. LEXIS 724, 1989 WL 37023

Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided April 19, 1989·No. No. 88-21·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

KNOLL, Judge.

For the reasons stated in the companion case of Cormier v. Habetz, 542 So.2d 814 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1989), in which a separate decision is being rendered by us this day, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed in part, reversed in part, amended in part and rendered.

All costs of the trial court and this appeal are assessed one-half to Louis Cormier and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, and one-half to Leonard Habetz and Louisiana Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company.

AFFIRMED IN PART, AMENDED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, AND RENDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KNOLL, Judge.

For the reasons stated in the companion case of Cormier v. Habetz, 542 So.2d 814 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1989), in which a separate decision is being rendered by us this day, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed in part, reversed in part, amended in part and rendered.

All costs of the trial court and this appeal are assessed one-half to Louis Cormier and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, and one-half to Leonard Habetz and Louisiana Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company.

AFFIRMED IN PART, AMENDED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, AND RENDERED.

Habetz v. Cormier, 542 So. 2d 819, 1989 La. App. LEXIS 724, 1989 WL 37023 (La. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

542 So. 2d 819 (Habetz v. Cormier) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related