Home/New York Court of Appeals/Haas v. O'Brien

Haas v. O'Brien

1 Abb. N. Cas. 173
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Haas v. O'Brien. Read the opinion of the Court — 66 N.Y. 597 →
New York Court of Appeals·Decided September 15, 1876·Published

Opinion

The Court (opinion by Miller, J.),

citing Tiffany v. Lucas, 15 Wall. 410; S. C., 8 Bankr. Reg. 49; Thrasher v. Bentley, reported at p. 39 of this vol.; Cook v. Rogers, 31 Mich. 391; Beck v. Parker, 65 Pa. St. 262; S. C., 3 Am. R. 625; Hawkins’ Appeal, 34 Conn. 548; Sedgwick v. Place, 1 Bankr. Reg. 204, 673; Langley v. Perry, 2 Id. 597; Mayer v. Hillman, 91 U. S. (1 Otto) 496; Smith v. Teutonia Ins. Co., 4 Chicago L. N. 130; In re Kintzing, 3 Bankr. Reg. 217; and disapproving (or distinguishing as founded partly on lack of evidence' of good faith), Foster v. Hackley, 2 Bankr. Reg. 406; Re Smith, 4 Ben. 1; S. C., 3 Bankr. Reg. 377; Re Goldschmidt, 3 Ben. 379; S. C., 3 Bankr. Reg. 165; Spicer v. Ward, 3 Id. 512; Randall v. Sunderland, 3 Id. 18; Re Wells, 3 Id. 371; Re Reid, 1 Dill. 439; Hardy v. Bininger, 7 Blatchf. 262; S. C., 4 Bankr. Reg. 262; held as above.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Haas v. O'Brien, 1 Abb. N. Cas. 173 (N.Y. 1876).

1 Abb. N. Cas. 173 (Haas v. O'Brien) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tiffany v. Lucas
82 U.S. 410 (Supreme Court, 1873)
Hawkins's Appeal from Probate
34 Conn. 548 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1868)
Cook v. Rogers
31 Mich. 391 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1875)
In re Bininger
3 F. Cas. 412 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1870)
In re Burt
4 F. Cas. 855 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota, 1870)
In re Goldschmidt
10 F. Cas. 564 (S.D. New York, 1869)
In re Smith
22 F. Cas. 385 (N.D. New York, 1869)