Haas v. King

216 A.D. 821
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 15, 1926·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order of the City Court of Mount Vernon setting aside verdict and granting new trial reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Defendants, by not asserting their right to sum up, and by not requesting the court to charge the jury, waived their right thereto. There is nothing in the papers which indicates that the defendants did not have a fair trial, or that the verdict of the jury was in any wise affected by reason of the omission of defendants’ counsel to sum up and the court to charge the jury. Kelly, P. J., Rich, Jaycox, Manning and Lazansky, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Haas v. King, 216 A.D. 821 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1926).

216 A.D. 821 (Haas v. King) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Saratoga Spa & Bath, Inc. v. Beeche Systems Corp.
230 A.D.2d 326 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Haefeli v. Woodrich Engineering Co.
175 N.E. 123 (New York Court of Appeals, 1931)