Haas v. Garnett

Supreme Court of Missouri

Haas v. Garnett

55 S.W. 1132, 155 Mo. 568, 1900 Mo. LEXIS 261

Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided March 30, 1900·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

MARSHALL, J.

This case in all its essential particulars is exactly like the case of Utley v. Hill, 155 Mo. 232, and [569] the decision in that case controls this. Here there were thirty-six exceptions filed, but the court sustained the same- exceptions that it sustained in the Htley case. Otherwise there is no difference between the two cases, and therefore for the reasons given in the Utley case, the judgment in this case is affirmed.

All concur, except Robinson, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MARSHALL, J.

This case in all its essential particulars is exactly like the case of Utley v. Hill, 155 Mo. 232, and [569] the decision in that case controls this. Here there were thirty-six exceptions filed, but the court sustained the same- exceptions that it sustained in the Htley case. Otherwise there is no difference between the two cases, and therefore for the reasons given in the Utley case, the judgment in this case is affirmed.

All concur, except Robinson, J., absent.

Haas v. Garnett, 55 S.W. 1132, 155 Mo. 568, 1900 Mo. LEXIS 261 (Mo. 1900).

Pincite

55 S.W. 1132 (Haas v. Garnett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related