H. W. Findley and Helen B. Findley v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
This text of 236 F.2d 959 (H. W. Findley and Helen B. Findley v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
236 F.2d 959
H. W. FINDLEY and Helen B. Findley, Petitioners,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.
No. 11947.
United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.
Argued October 5, 1956.
Decided October 11, 1956.
On Petition for Review of the Decision of the Tax Court of the United States.
Robert F. Banks, Pittsburgh, Pa., (Sidney B. Gambill, Reed, Smith, Shaw & McClay, Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for petitioners.
Sheldon I. Fink, Washington, D. C., (Charles K. Rice, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, Harry Baum, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., on the brief), for respondent.
Before McLAUGHLIN, KALODNER and STALEY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
In this fact case the careful opinion of Judge Pierce in the Tax Court is justified by the facts and the fair inferences therefrom. 25 T.C. 311.
The decision of the Tax Court will be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
236 F.2d 959, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/h-w-findley-and-helen-b-findley-v-commissioner-of-internal-revenue-ca3-1956.