H. W. Findley and Helen B. Findley v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

236 F.2d 959
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided October 11, 1956·No. 11947·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

236 F.2d 959

H. W. FINDLEY and Helen B. Findley, Petitioners,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.

No. 11947.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued October 5, 1956.

Decided October 11, 1956.

On Petition for Review of the Decision of the Tax Court of the United States.

Robert F. Banks, Pittsburgh, Pa., (Sidney B. Gambill, Reed, Smith, Shaw & McClay, Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for petitioners.

Sheldon I. Fink, Washington, D. C., (Charles K. Rice, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, Harry Baum, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., on the brief), for respondent.

Before McLAUGHLIN, KALODNER and STALEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

In this fact case the careful opinion of Judge Pierce in the Tax Court is justified by the facts and the fair inferences therefrom. 25 T.C. 311.

The decision of the Tax Court will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

H. W. Findley and Helen B. Findley v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 236 F.2d 959 (3d Cir. 1956).

236 F.2d 959 (H. W. Findley and Helen B. Findley v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

BRH Builders, Inc. v. United States
620 F. Supp. 7 (C.D. Illinois, 1985)