G.V. v. Department of Public Welfare

66 A.3d 252, 620 Pa. 58, 2013 WL 1156502, 2013 Pa. LEXIS 494

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in G.V. v. Department of Public Welfare. Read the opinion of the Court — 625 Pa. 280 →

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 21, 2013·No. No. 619 MAL 2012·Published

Opinion

[59]*59 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 21st day of March, 2013, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED on the following issue, as stated by Petitioner:

Whether Commonwealth Court erred in requiring a “clear and convincing” evidentiary standard of proof in child abuse expunction cases under the Child Protective Services Law (CPSL), 23 Pa.C.S. §§ 6301-6386, where the legislature had established substantial evidence as the required standard of proof?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[59]*59 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 21st day of March, 2013, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED on the following issue, as stated by Petitioner:

Whether Commonwealth Court erred in requiring a “clear and convincing” evidentiary standard of proof in child abuse expunction cases under the Child Protective Services Law (CPSL), 23 Pa.C.S. §§ 6301-6386, where the legislature had established substantial evidence as the required standard of proof?

G.V. v. Department of Public Welfare, 66 A.3d 252, 620 Pa. 58, 2013 WL 1156502, 2013 Pa. LEXIS 494 (Pa. 2013).

Pincite

66 A.3d 252 (G.V. v. Department of Public Welfare) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

§ 6301-6386

Pennsylvania § 6301-6386

Opinion

Related