G.V. v. Department of Public Welfare

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

G.V. v. Department of Public Welfare

66 A.3d 252

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in G.V. v. Department of Public Welfare. Read the opinion of the Court — 625 Pa. 280 →

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 21, 2013·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 21st day of March, 2013, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED on the following issue, as stated by Petitioner:

Whether Commonwealth Court erred in requiring a “clear and convincing” evi-dentiary standard of proof in child abuse expunction cases under the Child Protective Services Law (CPSL), 23 Pa.C.S. §§ 6301-6386, where the legislature had established substantial evidence as the required standard of proof?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 21st day of March, 2013, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED on the following issue, as stated by Petitioner:

Whether Commonwealth Court erred in requiring a “clear and convincing” evi-dentiary standard of proof in child abuse expunction cases under the Child Protective Services Law (CPSL), 23 Pa.C.S. §§ 6301-6386, where the legislature had established substantial evidence as the required standard of proof?

G.V. v. Department of Public Welfare, 66 A.3d 252 (Pa. 2013).

Pincite

66 A.3d 252 (G.V. v. Department of Public Welfare) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related