Guzman v. Crispy Catfish and Seafood, Inc.

667 So. 2d 1037, 1996 WL 71106
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided February 16, 1996·No. 95-CC-3031·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

667 So.2d 1037 (1996)

Desiree GUZMAN
v.
CRISPY CATFISH AND SEAFOOD, INC., Ronald Caire and Dianne Caire.

No. 95-CC-3031.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 16, 1996.

Granted. Relator Desiree Guzman's application is granted. Lower courts' rulings are reversed. Relator's motion to strike the jury is granted. Answer to discovery is not a pleading directed to a triable issue. See La.C.C.P. art. 1733(C) and Zeller v. Jording, 624 So.2d 432, 433 (La.App. 4th Cir.1993).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Guzman v. Crispy Catfish and Seafood, Inc., 667 So. 2d 1037, 1996 WL 71106 (La. 1996).

667 So. 2d 1037 (Guzman v. Crispy Catfish and Seafood, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hall v. K-Mart
755 So. 2d 1020 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2000)
Butler v. Walgreen Louisiana Co.
754 So. 2d 954 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2000)
Broussard v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
682 So. 2d 894 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1996)