Guzman v. Crispy Catfish and Seafood, Inc.
667 So. 2d 1037, 1996 WL 71106
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedFebruary 16, 1996
Docket95-CC-3031
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases
This text of 667 So. 2d 1037 (Guzman v. Crispy Catfish and Seafood, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Guzman v. Crispy Catfish and Seafood, Inc., 667 So. 2d 1037, 1996 WL 71106 (La. 1996).
Opinion
Desiree GUZMAN
v.
CRISPY CATFISH AND SEAFOOD, INC., Ronald Caire and Dianne Caire.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Granted. Relator Desiree Guzman's application is granted. Lower courts' rulings are reversed. Relator's motion to strike the jury is granted. Answer to discovery is not a pleading directed to a triable issue. See La.C.C.P. art. 1733(C) and Zeller v. Jording, 624 So.2d 432, 433 (La.App. 4th Cir.1993).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Hall v. K-Mart
755 So. 2d 1020 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2000)
Butler v. Walgreen Louisiana Co.
754 So. 2d 954 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2000)
Broussard v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
682 So. 2d 894 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1996)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
667 So. 2d 1037, 1996 WL 71106, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/guzman-v-crispy-catfish-and-seafood-inc-la-1996.