Guyton v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Guyton v. State

226 S.W.3d 272, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 942, 2007 WL 1813589

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Guyton v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 760 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 26, 2007·No. No. WD 66177·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Christopher V. Guyton appeals the denial after an evidentiary hearing of his Rule 29.15 motion for ineffective assistance of counsel. After a thorough review of the record, we find that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value, but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Christopher V. Guyton appeals the denial after an evidentiary hearing of his Rule 29.15 motion for ineffective assistance of counsel. After a thorough review of the record, we find that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value, but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Guyton v. State, 226 S.W.3d 272, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 942, 2007 WL 1813589 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

226 S.W.3d 272 (Guyton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.