Home/Missouri Court of Appeals/Guyton v. State

Guyton v. State

254 S.W.3d 894, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 760, 2008 WL 2246661
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 3, 2008
DocketED 89605
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 254 S.W.3d 894 (Guyton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Guyton v. State, 254 S.W.3d 894, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 760, 2008 WL 2246661 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Darius Guyton, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, movant argues that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to inform him of his right to testify at trial.

The motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for *895 this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Bond
254 S.W.3d 894 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
254 S.W.3d 894, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 760, 2008 WL 2246661, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/guyton-v-state-moctapp-2008.