Guysinger v. Warden Noble Correctional Institution
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION DEREK GUYSINGER, Petitioner, : Case No. 2:19-cv-774 -VS- Judge Sarah D. Morrison Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson WARDEN, NOBLE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Respondent.
OPINION AND ORDER This matter is before the Court for consideration of Petitioner’s Motion for Pauper Status pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 24(a)(3)(A). (ECF No. 22.) Petitioner submits a financial affidavit in support of that motion. (ECF No. 24.) Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(3)(A) provides that: [a] party who was permitted to proceed in forma pauperis in the district-court action, or who was determined to be financially unable to obtain an adequate defense in a criminal case, may proceed on appeal in forma pauperis without further authorization, unless:
... the district court--before or after the notice of appeal is filed--certifies that the appeal is not taken in good faith or finds that the party is not otherwise entitled to proceed in forma pauperis and states in writing its reasons for the certification finding[.]
The good faith standard is an objective one. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 445 (1962). An appeal is not taken in good faith if the issue presented is frivolous. /d. Petitioner was not previously granted pauper status in this Court. Therefore, it is unclear if Rule 24(a)(3)(A) applies. To the extent it does and even if Petitioner is financially qualified for pauper status, the Court CERTIFIES that his appeal is frivolous. The Court previously
determined that the state court reasonably concluded that Petitioner’s ineffective assistance claims were governed by Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984), and that the state court reasonably concluded that Petitioner’s claims failed under that governing standard. (ECF No. 19.) As articulated in that Opinion, Petitioner has no good faith basis for appealing those determinations. (/d.) Accordingly, Petitioner’s Motion is DENIED. (ECF No. 22). IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Sarah D. Morrison SARAH D. MORRISON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Guysinger v. Warden Noble Correctional Institution (Guysinger v. Warden Noble Correctional Institution) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.