Guthrie v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Ry.
27 A. 1052, 158 Pa. 433, 1893 Pa. LEXIS 1608
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 13, 1893·No. Appeal, No. 186·Published·Cited by 8 cases
Opinion
For reasons given in the opinion of the learned judge of the common pleas we think there is no error in the judgment entered on the case stated. Neither of the specifications of error is sustained.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Guthrie v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Ry., 27 A. 1052, 158 Pa. 433, 1893 Pa. LEXIS 1608 (Pa. 1893).
27 A. 1052 (Guthrie v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Ry.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Reif Appeal
43 Pa. D. & C.2d 527 (Alleghany County Court of Common Pleas, 1967)
Girard Trust Co. v. Philadelphia
87 A.2d 277 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1952)
Commonwealth v. Pittsburgh School District
23 A.2d 496 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1941)
Escheat of Deposits Outside State
33 Pa. D. & C. 329 (Pennsylvania Department of Justice, 1938)
Tax on Corporate Loans
2 Pa. D. & C. 438 (Pennsylvania Department of Justice, 1922)
State v. Beardsley
77 Fla. 803 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1919)
Goodsite v. Lane
139 F. 593 (Sixth Circuit, 1905)