Guthrie v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Ry.

27 A. 1052, 158 Pa. 433, 1893 Pa. LEXIS 1608
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedNovember 13, 1893
DocketAppeal, No. 186
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 27 A. 1052 (Guthrie v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Ry.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Guthrie v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Ry., 27 A. 1052, 158 Pa. 433, 1893 Pa. LEXIS 1608 (Pa. 1893).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

For reasons given in the opinion of the learned judge of the common pleas we think there is no error in the judgment entered on the case stated. Neither of the specifications of error is sustained.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Reif Appeal
43 Pa. D. & C.2d 527 (Alleghany County Court of Common Pleas, 1967)
Girard Trust Co. v. Philadelphia
87 A.2d 277 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1952)
Commonwealth v. Pittsburgh School District
23 A.2d 496 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1941)
Escheat of Deposits Outside State
33 Pa. D. & C. 329 (Pennsylvania Department of Justice, 1938)
Tax on Corporate Loans
2 Pa. D. & C. 438 (Pennsylvania Department of Justice, 1922)
State v. Beardsley
77 Fla. 803 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1919)
Goodsite v. Lane
139 F. 593 (Sixth Circuit, 1905)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
27 A. 1052, 158 Pa. 433, 1893 Pa. LEXIS 1608, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/guthrie-v-pittsburgh-cincinnati-st-louis-ry-pa-1893.