Gum Carbo Co. v. New Orleans German Gazette
This text of 43 So. 82 (Gum Carbo Co. v. New Orleans German Gazette) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
We can find no error in the chancellor’s ruling sustain[181]*181ing the demurrer, dissolving the injunction, and dismissing the bill filed in this case. There is nothing in the record which presents any ground for equitable relief. By the exercise of the most .ordinary diligence appellant could have relieved itself from the error alleged to have been committed by the justice of the peace in entering the judgment. Its own negligence forms the only basis for its resort to the chancery court for relief, and, this being the case, it has no standing in a court of equity. TIad it exercised proper diligence, the courts of law afforded it ample remedy. McRaney v. Coulter, 39 Miss., 392; Bruner v. Planters’ Bank, 23 Miss., 406; Hamilton v. Moore, 32 Miss., 625; Hiller & Co. v. Cotton, 48 Miss., 593; Fleming v. Nunn & Anderson, 61 Miss., 603.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
43 So. 82, 90 Miss. 177, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gum-carbo-co-v-new-orleans-german-gazette-miss-1907.