Bruner v. Planters Bank

23 Miss. 406
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 15, 1852
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 23 Miss. 406 (Bruner v. Planters Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bruner v. Planters Bank, 23 Miss. 406 (Mich. 1852).

Opinion

Per curiam.

The plaintiff in error filed his bill for an injunction and a new trial of a judgment at law, rendered against him in the circuit court of "Warren county, as a member of the firm of J. Gilmore & Co., on a note executed by the firm, upon the allegation that he was not a member of that firm, and did not execute the note. • The pleadings show, that he was regularly served in person, with process in the action at law"; that a plea was filed for all the parties to the suit, which was withdrawn and a judgment by default rendered. Neither the bill or proof exhibits any sufficient excuse on "the part of complainant for not defending at law; and as he-had his day in court and might have defended, it is too late to seek relief in equity, for a wrong produced by his own negligence.

Decree affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gum Carbo Co. v. New Orleans German Gazette
43 So. 82 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1907)
Weddell v. Seal
45 Miss. 726 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1871)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
23 Miss. 406, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bruner-v-planters-bank-miss-1852.