Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP v. Ostro

District Court, S.D. Texas·Decided December 13, 2019·No. 4:19-cv-02885·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT December 13, 2019 FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS David J. Bradley, Clerk HOUSTON DIVISION

GULF SOUTH PIPELINE COMPANY, LP § § Plaintiff, § § VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. H-19-2885 § TX-MQ-0050.00000: 5.26 ACRES, MORE § OR LESS, in the Jose Maria De La Garza § Survey, Abstract Number 15, Montgomery § County, TX; DAVID OSTRO and MID § AMERICA MORTGAGE, INC.; et al., § § Defendants. §

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT CONFIRMING GULF SOUTH PIPELINE COMPANY, LP’S RIGHT TO CONDEMN, FOR AN INJUCNTION GRANTING IMMEDIATE POSSESSION, AND FOR LEAVE TO DEPOSIT FUNDS INTO THE REGISTRY OF THE COURT

Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP has moved for partial summary judgment confirming its right to condemn land to build a pipeline, for an injunction granting immediate possession of that land, and for leave to deposit funds into the court registry. Gulf South has reached an agreement with all but one property owner: the Mendoza Property, who has not appeared. This makes entry of default appropriate. Based on the motion, the record, and the law, the court grants the motion for partial summary judgment.1 The reasons and relief are set out below.

1 A plaintiff’s failure to respond alone is not a proper basis for granting summary judgment. However, it is appropriate for the court to decide the motion based on the record before it. Hibernia Nat. Bank v. Administracion Cent. Sociedad Anonima, 776 F. 2d 1277, 1279 (5th Cir. 1985); Chero-Key Piping Co. v. Great-West Life & Annuity Ins. Co., No. CIV A H-08-2696, 2010 WL 1169957, at *5 (S.D. Tex. Mar. 23, 2010). I. Background and Factual Findings Gulf South is a natural gas company under Section 2(a) of the Natural Gas Act, 15 U.S.C. § 717(a)(6). Gulf South was issued a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to construct, operate, and maintain an interstate natural gas pipeline and related facilities in San Jacinto and Montgomery Counties, Texas. This in-rem

action by Gulf South under the Natural Gas Act, § 717f(h) and Rule 71.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure seeks to condemn interests in four tracts of real property located in Montgomery County, Texas. These tracts are described in the survey plats attached to Gulf South’s complaint in as Exhibits 4 through 7. They are identified in this Memorandum and Order as the Mendoza Property, the Mavrogordato Property, the Kana Property, and the Pensco Property. The defendants are these properties, along with the individual owners and other entities that have or may have ownership interests in these properties. Gulf South seeks partial summary judgment confirming its right to condemn the interests sought in these properties. Gulf South also seeks an injunction granting it authority to immediately

access and possess the interests condemned in the Mendoza Property. No responses have been filed in opposition to Gulf South’s motions. The court has jurisdiction under the Natural Gas Act, 15 U.S.C. § 717f(h). In July 2019, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission issued an order granting Gulf South a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity under § 717f(c). Gulf South Pipeline Co., LP, 168 FERC ¶ 61,036 (2019); (Docket Entry No. 68-B). The Certificate authorizes Gulf South to construct and operate a new 19-mile, 24-inch diameter lateral pipeline and appurtenant facilities in San Jacinto and Montgomery Counties, Texas, and to construct and operate a new compressor unit at its existing Goodrich Compressor Station in Polk County, Texas. This project is referred to as the Willis Lateral Project. The Pipeline will begin at a new interconnection with Gulf South’s Index 129 interstate natural-gas pipeline system in San Jacinto County, and extend westward to Entergy Texas, Inc’s Montgomery County Power Station on the Lewis Creek Reservoir, known as the Lewis Creek Power Plant. The Willis Lateral Project will allow Gulf South to transport up to 200,000 dekatherms per day of natural gas to the Lewis Creek Power

Plant, where Entergy will generate nearly one gigawatt per day of electrical power. In the Order issuing the Certificate, the Commission determined that public convenience and necessity required approval of the Willis Lateral Project. No party timely sought rehearing or direct appeal of the Order issuing the Certificate. The interests Gulf South seeks to condemn in the four properties are necessary to construct and operate the Project the Certificate authorized. Both the Commission and Entergy have imposed deadlines that Gulf South must meet in building the Willis Lateral Project, including an interim in-service date of July 1, 2020, for the delivery of test gas to Entergy. The interests Gulf South seeks to condemn in the four properties are necessary for Gulf South to meet its contractual

and regulatory deadlines. Gulf South has reached agreements with the owners of approximately 92% of the affected tracts of land for the easement rights the project requires. Gulf South has made offers in excess of $3,000 to the owners of each of the four properties at issue.2 Gulf South has been unable to acquire the necessary easements on one of the remaining properties. The construction contracts will require Gulf South to provide the contractor with access along the entire length of the Pipeline. Constructing the Pipeline will involve specialized

2 Gulf South has reached voluntary Possession and Use Agreements with the owners of the Kana Property, Mavrogordato Property, and Pensco Property rendering any request for injunctive relief with respect to these three tracts and their owners moot. (See Docket Entry No. 80 at 2 n.1). contractors and approximately 400 personnel. Construction must progress sequentially, working from one end of the pipeline to the other. Gulf South’s scheduled preliminary construction and staging, then right-of-way construction work, must begin by January 2020 to allow Gulf South to meet the environmental conditions the Commission established and the July 1, 2020, interim in-service deadline Entergy

included in its agreement with Gulf South. The four properties at issue are interspersed in different locations along the Pipeline. Without possession of the easements condemned in these properties, Gulf South will have to build the Pipeline up to the first property, move around the tract, then build up to the second of the properties, move around that tract, and so on. Each unscheduled move-around will cost Gulf South an estimated $250,000. Gulf South cannot recover these move-around costs. If Gulf South has to return later to complete construction, it will incur additional costs in remobilizing contractors and inspectors, reentering the tracts adjoining the properties, reexcavating the pipeline, and sectioning-in the pipeline from the missing locations. This will cost

approximately $2.2 million and cause unnecessary disruption to the neighboring landowners on either side of each property. Once Gulf South has completed this construction, it must perform the testing needed to commission the Pipeline and the Lewis Creek Power Plant station. The testing and commissioning will take a minimum of 60 days. Gulf South will incur approximately $500,000 in additional costs remobilizing the equipment, materials, and personnel to test and commission the pipeline. A lack of immediate possession and access to the properties will add a minimum of 120 days in delay. The cost of the delay will be a minimum of $3,200,000, which Gulf South will be unable to recover.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP v. Ostro, (S.D. Tex. 2019).

Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP v. Ostro (Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP v. Ostro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related