Guilford v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Guilford v. State

715 So. 2d 363, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 10408, 1998 WL 473011

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 14, 1998

DocketNo. 98-1912

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 715 So. 2d 363 (Guilford v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Guilford v. State, 715 So. 2d 363, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 10408, 1998 WL 473011 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the lower court’s denial of the defendant’s most recent post-conviction motion. This is the defendant’s fourth post-conviction motion and sixth appeal or petition to this court concerning his convictions and sentences in Case , No. 91-6837-CFA. Enough is enough. The defendant is prohibited from filing any further pro se pleadings with this court concerning his convictions and sentences in Case No. 91-6837-CFA. As this court did in Hendrix v. State, 712 So.2d 778 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998); Davis v. State, 705 So.2d 138 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998); Rooney v. State, 699 So.2d 1027 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997) and O’Brien v. State, 689 So.2d 336 (Fla. 5th DCA), rev. denied, 697 So.2d 511 (Fla.1997), the defendant is warned of the consequences of persisting.

AFFIRMED. '

COBB, GOSHORN and HARRIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the lower court’s denial of the defendant’s most recent post-conviction motion. This is the defendant’s fourth post-conviction motion and sixth appeal or petition to this court concerning his convictions and sentences in Case , No. 91-6837-CFA. Enough is enough. The defendant is prohibited from filing any further pro se pleadings with this court concerning his convictions and sentences in Case No. 91-6837-CFA. As this court did in Hendrix v. State, 712 So.2d 778 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998); Davis v. State, 705 So.2d 138 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998); Rooney v. State, 699 So.2d 1027 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997) and O’Brien v. State, 689 So.2d 336 (Fla. 5th DCA), rev. denied, 697 So.2d 511 (Fla.1997), the defendant is warned of the consequences of persisting.

AFFIRMED. '

COBB, GOSHORN and HARRIS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

715 So. 2d 363, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 10408, 1998 WL 473011, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/guilford-v-state-fladistctapp-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack