Gilliam v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Gilliam v. State

705 So. 2d 138, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 1142, 1998 WL 51358

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 11, 1998

DocketNo. 96-2202

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 705 So. 2d 138 (Gilliam v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gilliam v. State, 705 So. 2d 138, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 1142, 1998 WL 51358 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We find no error pursuant to Coney v. State, 653 So.2d 1009 (Fla.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 921, 116 S.Ct. 315, 133 L.Ed.2d 218 (1995), where the record conclusively demonstrates that all of the prospective venire persons had been excused from the courtroom when the peremptory challenges were made in open court, and the appellant was present at all times to confer with his counsel about such challenges.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We find no error pursuant to Coney v. State, 653 So.2d 1009 (Fla.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 921, 116 S.Ct. 315, 133 L.Ed.2d 218 (1995), where the record conclusively demonstrates that all of the prospective venire persons had been excused from the courtroom when the peremptory challenges were made in open court, and the appellant was present at all times to confer with his counsel about such challenges.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

705 So. 2d 138, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 1142, 1998 WL 51358, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gilliam-v-state-fladistctapp-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack