Gilliam v. State
705 So. 2d 138, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 1142, 1998 WL 51358
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 11, 1998·No. No. 96-2202·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We find no error pursuant to Coney v. State, 653 So.2d 1009 (Fla.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 921, 116 S.Ct. 315, 133 L.Ed.2d 218 (1995), where the record conclusively demonstrates that all of the prospective venire persons had been excused from the courtroom when the peremptory challenges were made in open court, and the appellant was present at all times to confer with his counsel about such challenges.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gilliam v. State, 705 So. 2d 138, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 1142, 1998 WL 51358 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).
705 So. 2d 138 (Gilliam v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Guilford v. State
715 So. 2d 363 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)