Guidroz v. Bochenski

170 A.D.2d 1042
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 1, 1991
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 170 A.D.2d 1042 (Guidroz v. Bochenski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Guidroz v. Bochenski, 170 A.D.2d 1042 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

Motion for a stay granted to the extent that the order of Supreme Court is vacated pursuant to CPLR 5704 (a) and appeal is dismissed; cross motion to vacate temporary stay denied. Memorandum: Supreme Court erroneously vacated a Family Court order which had granted temporary custody to respondents. A motion that attempts to affect an order validly issued must be directed to the Judge who issues it (see, CPLR 2221). Since the Family Court is in this instance a court of coordinate jurisdiction pursuant to Family Court Act § 651, Supreme Court had no authority to grant an ex parte order vacating a validly issued temporary order of custody (see, CPLR 2221 [a] [2]; see [1043]*1043also, Alberts v Alberts, 168 AD2d 1004). Thus, the Supreme Court order is vacated (see, CPLR 5704 [a]). Present—Callahan, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Lawton, JJ. (Order entered Jan. 17, 1991.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Grossman v. Composto-Longhi
96 A.D.3d 1000 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
170 A.D.2d 1042, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/guidroz-v-bochenski-nyappdiv-1991.