Alberts v. Alberts

168 A.D.2d 1004
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 21, 1990
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 168 A.D.2d 1004 (Alberts v. Alberts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alberts v. Alberts, 168 A.D.2d 1004 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed with costs to defendant, and matter remitted to Supreme Court for further proceedings, in accordance with the following memorandum: Absent a showing of extraordinary circumstances, it was error for Supreme Court to make a temporary custody determination in an ex parte order to show cause. A custody determination, which may drastically affect a child’s welfare, ordinarily should not be based solely on an ex parte application. When defendant’s attorney appeared to object, the court compounded the error by permitting the children, whom the mother had removed from the marital residence pursuant to the ex parte order, to remain with the mother as the primary custodial parent, without conducting a hearing (see, Audubon v Audubon, 138 AD2d 658; Savas v Savas, 127 AD2d 578). We, therefore, modify Supreme Court’s order by deleting the first decretal paragraph and remit the matter to Supreme Court for an immediate hearing before a different Justice on the issue of temporary custody. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Wolfgang, J. — temporary support.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Denman, Balio, Lawton and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nicotera v. Nicotera
222 A.D.2d 892 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Hizme v. Hizme
212 A.D.2d 580 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Kronenberger v. Kronenberger
204 A.D.2d 1059 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Brozzo v. Brozzo
192 A.D.2d 878 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Klam v. Klam
797 F. Supp. 202 (E.D. New York, 1992)
Guidroz v. Bochenski
170 A.D.2d 1042 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
168 A.D.2d 1004, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alberts-v-alberts-nyappdiv-1990.