Guice (Billy) v. Fortenberry (Ray)
726 F.2d 752
This text of 726 F.2d 752 (Guice (Billy) v. Fortenberry (Ray)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Guice (Billy) v. Fortenberry (Ray), 726 F.2d 752 (5th Cir. 1984).
Opinion
726 F.2d 752
Guice (Billy)
v.
Fortenberry (Ray)
NO. 83-4022
United States Court of Appeals,
fifth Circuit.
FEB 13, 1984
Appeal From: W.D.La., 722 F.2d 276
Denials of Rehearing En Banc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Billy Guice and Howard Claxton, Sr. v. Ray Fortenberry, Superintendent, East Carroll Parish Prison Farm, Louisiana
722 F.2d 276 (Fifth Circuit, 1984)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
726 F.2d 752, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/guice-billy-v-fortenberry-ray-ca5-1984.