Guest v. H. Rhine & Bros.

16 Tex. 549
Texas Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1856·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinion

Wheeler, J.

Since the decision of the case of Merlin v. Manning, (2 Tex. R.,) it has been the settled doctrine of this Court, maintained by repeated decisions, that the equitable owner of a note may maintain an action upon it in his own name, though the legal title be in another. The plaintiffs averred that they were the owners of the note. The judgment by default must be taken to have established the truth of the averment; and after the default nothing remained but for the Clerk to assess the damages, under the Statute. (Hart. Dig. Art. 812.)

The writ of error was evidently prosecuted for delay, and the judgment is affirmed with damages.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Guest v. H. Rhine & Bros., 16 Tex. 549 (Tex. 1856).

16 Tex. 549 (Guest v. H. Rhine & Bros.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

San Antonio Paper Co. v. Morgan
53 S.W.2d 651 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1932)
Love v. Allard
286 S.W. 581 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1926)
Grimes v. Tracy-Maysfield Oil & Gas Co.
257 S.W. 636 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1923)
Ramsey v. Wahl
235 S.W. 838 (Texas Commission of Appeals, 1921)
Wahl v. Ramsey
218 S.W. 559 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1920)
Ball-Thrash & Co. v. McCormick
78 S.E. 303 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1913)
McAdams v. McAdams
32 S.W. 87 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1895)
Manhattan Life Ins. v. P. J. Willis & Bro.
60 F. 236 (Fifth Circuit, 1894)
Loungeway v. Hale
11 S.W. 537 (Texas Supreme Court, 1889)
G. H. & S. A. R. R. v. Freeman
57 Tex. 156 (Texas Supreme Court, 1882)
Johnson v. Dowling
1 White & W. 615 (Texas Commission of Appeals, 1881)