Guest v. Guest

1 Dallam 394
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 15, 1841
DocketNo. IX
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 1 Dallam 394 (Guest v. Guest) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Guest v. Guest, 1 Dallam 394 (Tex. 1841).

Opinion

SCURRY, Justice.

In this case it appears from the record that judgment of nonsuit was entered by the court below upon motion of the defendant. The word nonsuit is technical in its meaning, and alone specifies that it is by the action of a party bringing a suit that such judgment can be rendered. Nonsuit can be taken by the plaintiff below; but neither the district court nor any other court has the power to compel the party to take a nonsuit.

A party may take a judgment by nonsuit if he chooses, but the court can not force him to do so. 1 Pet., 471.

The district court has no power whatsoever to order a peremptory non-suit. 6 Pet., 598.

Nonsuit may be entered by the court, but not without the acquiescence and consent of the plaintiff. 1 Pet., 491.

It is therefore the opinion of the court, that this cause be remanded to the court below, and that the judgment of nonsuit be set aside and a new trial awarded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sandoval v. Rosser
26 S.W. 932 (Texas Supreme Court, 1894)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Dallam 394, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/guest-v-guest-tex-1841.