Doe on the Demise of Elmore v. Grymes

26 U.S. 469, 7 L. Ed. 224, 1 Pet. 469, 1828 U.S. LEXIS 418
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedFebruary 26, 1828
StatusPublished
Cited by54 cases

This text of 26 U.S. 469 (Doe on the Demise of Elmore v. Grymes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Doe on the Demise of Elmore v. Grymes, 26 U.S. 469, 7 L. Ed. 224, 1 Pet. 469, 1828 U.S. LEXIS 418 (1828).

Opinions

Mr. Chief Justice Marshall

delivered the opinion of the Court.-—

The Court has had this, case under its consideration, and is of opinion that the Circuit Court had no authority to order a peremptory nonsuit, against the will pf the plaintiff. He had [472]*472a right by law to a trial by a jury; and to have had the case submitted to them.- He might agree to a nonsuit;- but if he did not so choose, the Court; could not compel him- to submit to it. But the state.of the' record does not en.able'this Court to render a final judgment, because the record is defective, in not shiow-inga judgment of nonsuit, entered in the Circuit Court. Although the bill of. exceptions states that fact yet the-record does not contain the judgment itself..

The plaintiff may therefore apply for a. certiorari, tp bring up a perfect record,-or dismiss-.the present writ of error and proceed anew; as his counsel may think best for the interest of their client. '*

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Esquivel v. Zinke
E.D. Washington, 2020
Davis v. State
90 N.E.2d 803 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1950)
Galloway v. United States
319 U.S. 372 (Supreme Court, 1943)
J. Schnarr & Co. v. Virginia-Carolina Chemical Corp.
159 So. 39 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1934)
Langwa v. Gorton-Pew Vessels Co.
59 F.2d 315 (First Circuit, 1932)
Stapleton v. Reading Co.
26 F.2d 242 (Third Circuit, 1928)
L. Vogelstein & Co. v. United States
55 Ct. Cl. 490 (Court of Claims, 1920)
Slocum v. New York Life Insurance
228 U.S. 364 (Supreme Court, 1913)
First National Bank v. City Council of Estherville
129 N.W. 475 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1911)
Parks v. Southern Ry. Co.
143 F. 276 (Fourth Circuit, 1906)
Huntt v. McNamee
141 F. 293 (Fourth Circuit, 1905)
Boyce v. Snow
58 N.E. 403 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1900)
Boyce v. Snow
88 Ill. App. 402 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1900)
Carney v. Duniway
57 P. 192 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1899)
Patting v. Spring Valley Coal Co.
93 F. 98 (U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois, 1899)
Ordway v. Boston & Maine Railroad
45 A. 243 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1898)
Coughran v. Bigelow
164 U.S. 301 (Supreme Court, 1896)
Zittle v. Schlesinger
65 N.W. 892 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1896)
Cook v. Morris
33 A. 994 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1895)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
26 U.S. 469, 7 L. Ed. 224, 1 Pet. 469, 1828 U.S. LEXIS 418, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doe-on-the-demise-of-elmore-v-grymes-scotus-1828.