Guerra v. State

623 So. 2d 610, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 8915, 1993 WL 331903
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 3, 1993
DocketNo. 92-2485
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 623 So. 2d 610 (Guerra v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Guerra v. State, 623 So. 2d 610, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 8915, 1993 WL 331903 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

It has become axiomatic under Florida sentencing law that a court may not depart from the guidelines without providing timely filed written reasons. Here, by supporting the departure only with oral reasons at the sentencing hearing, the trial court erroneously imposed a sentence one and one-half years in excess of the guidelines. Ree v. State, 565 So.2d 1329 (Fla.1990). The failure to support the departure deprives the trial court of the opportunity to impose the harsher sentence upon remand. Pope v. State, 561 So.2d 554 (Fla.1990). The judgment of conviction is affirmed, but the sentence is vacated and we remand for resentencing within the guidelines.

HARRIS, C.J., and W. SHARP and PETERSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ruff v. State
637 So. 2d 57 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
623 So. 2d 610, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 8915, 1993 WL 331903, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/guerra-v-state-fladistctapp-1993.