Guerra v. State

567 So. 2d 62, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7663, 1990 WL 149803
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 9, 1990·No. No. 90-698·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The state correctly concedes that a written order of probation revocation must conform with the court’s oral pronouncements. Salmon v. State, 540 So.2d 922 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Williams v. State, 525 So.2d 458 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988). We therefore remand for the entry of a corrected order of probation revocation to conform with the trial court’s oral pronouncement at the probation revocation hearing; defendant’s probation is revoked solely because he failed to report and perform community service hours required as a condition of probation. Revocation based on the defendant’s commission of four burglaries and thefts should be stricken from the probation revocation order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Guerra v. State, 567 So. 2d 62, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7663, 1990 WL 149803 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

567 So. 2d 62 (Guerra v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cardentey v. State
621 So. 2d 1093 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Thomas v. State
585 So. 2d 475 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)