Cardentey v. State

621 So. 2d 1093, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 8359
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 10, 1993·No. Nos. 93-63, 92-2730·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the revocation of probation. However, we remand for the entry of a corrected order that conforms with the trial court’s oral pronouncement at the probation revocation hearing, that defendant was in violation only of conditions two and four. See Guerra v. State, 567 So.2d 62 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cardentey v. State, 621 So. 2d 1093, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 8359 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

621 So. 2d 1093 (Cardentey v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Guerra v. State
567 So. 2d 62 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)