Gudanowski v. John Doe, N.Y. State Trooper
Opinion
MEMORANDUM ENDORSEMENT Gudanowski v. John Doe, N.Y. State Trooper et al. 20 CV 111 (VB) In the attached “declaration in opposition to Attorney General’s failure to provide the names of the John Doe defendants,” dated April 16, 2020, plaintiff, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, does not declare anything. Nor does he seek any relief. To the extent plaintiff “opposes” the fact the Attorney General has not yet provided the identities of the John Doe defendants plaintiff sought to sue in his complaint, the Attorney General has until May 4, 2020, to identify these defendants and supply such information to the plaintiff and to the Court. (See Doc. #7). In addition, plaintiff’s declaration is addressed to my Chambers. Plaintiff must address all future correspondence to the Pro Se Clerk at the following address: United States District Court Pro Se Clerk 300 Quarropas St. White Plains, NY 10601
The Court will disregard any future submissions sent directly to Chambers. To be clear, the Court will return to plaintiff all future submissions sent directly to Chambers. Chambers will mail a copy of this Order to plaintiff at the address on the docket. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Dated: April 21, 2020 White Plains, NY SO ORDERED: { Vincent L. Briccetti United States District Judge
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
PAUL T. GUDANOWSKT
Fill in above the full name of each plaintiff or petitioner. Case No. 20-CV-00111-VB -against- JOHN DOE#1,N.Y.STATE TROOPER,et al.,
Fill in above the full name of each defendant or respondent. DECLARATION In Opposition to Attorney General's failure to provide the names of the John Doeedefendants. Dated: April 16, 2020 (Doc#9) Briefly explain above the purpose of the declaration, for example, “in Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment.”
I PAUL T. GUDANOWSKI , declare under penalty of perjury that the following facts are true and correct: in the space below, describe any fagts that are relevant to the motion or that respond to a court er. You may also refer to ghd atfach apy relevant documents. 7 \ (XO
Rev, 6/30/16
Attack addifional pages and documents if necessary. -~ i £ 6/20 VALS JAX Executed on (date) Signature PAUL T. GUDANOWSKI 17A4084 Name Prison Identification # (if incarcerated) Collins Corr. Facility PO BOX 340 Collins, NY 14034-0340 Address City State Zip Code
Telephone Number (if available) E-mail Address (if available)
. Page 2
© 2 35 cry . wewree BLD FB = Soe □ ©) os = ae thy me - fin) fae! = gaye St) □ we ro “hed wate wo Re ea Aa me Sas □□ aol sewer 5 ee EE oF if Oo Ney od LR ee gC Bo Co g ove 2 we OP Co ay uu ow oem € oO □ fz? ce oY wt ma my Ee . ~ nw oO it FD © ;VO oO Lt A eed Wi eS wd pose a . fa Dp □□ in : Oo KH © fH . ol
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gudanowski v. John Doe, N.Y. State Trooper (Gudanowski v. John Doe, N.Y. State Trooper) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.