Guarino v. Timares

196 Misc. 414, 94 N.Y.S.2d 262, 1949 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3075
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided October 20, 1949·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It is undisputed that there was no certificate of occupancy issued for the premises in question and that the violation existed during the period for which rent was claimed. This proceeding for nonpayment of rent is therefore barred by the provisions of paragraph b of subdivision 1 of section 302 of the Multiple Dwelling Law. (Conka v. MacAloon, N. Y. L. J., Jan. 12, 1948, p. 132, col. 4; Mellini v. Di Martino, N. Y. L. J., March 16, 1940, p. 1218, col. 6.)

The final order and judgment should be unanimously reversed upon the law, with $30 costs to the tenant, and landlord’s petition dismissed, with appropriate costs in the court below.

Steinbrink, Fennelly and Rubenstein, JJ., concur.

Final order and judgment reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Guarino v. Timares, 196 Misc. 414, 94 N.Y.S.2d 262, 1949 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3075 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1949).

196 Misc. 414 (Guarino v. Timares) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

111 on 11 Realty Corp. v. Norton
189 Misc. 2d 389 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 2001)
40 Clinton Street Associates v. Dolgin
126 Misc. 2d 373 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1984)
Lipkis v. Pikus
96 Misc. 2d 581 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1978)
Washington Square Professional Building, Inc. v. Leader
68 Misc. 2d 72 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1971)
Guarino v. Timares
276 A.D.2d 847 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1949)