Guaranty Trust Co. of New York v. Metropolitan St. Ry. Co.

177 F. 925, 101 C.C.A. 205, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 4437
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedFebruary 28, 1910
DocketNo. 174
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 177 F. 925 (Guaranty Trust Co. of New York v. Metropolitan St. Ry. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Guaranty Trust Co. of New York v. Metropolitan St. Ry. Co., 177 F. 925, 101 C.C.A. 205, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 4437 (2d Cir. 1910).

Opinion

WARD, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a decree of foreclosure under a mortgage dated February 1, 1897, from the Metropolitan Street Railway Company to the Guaranty Trust Company of New York. Many assignments of error have been filed by various parties in interest. The Morton Trust Company, trustee under a later mortgage dated March 21, 1902, upon the same property, together with other properly not covered by the Guaranty Company’s mortgage, objects that the decree directs the sale of certain items of property which it is claimed are not covered by the mortgage, viz., certain track-age agreements with other street railway companies and certain property, consisting principally of cars, electric cables and equipment, and stores acquired after the date of the mortgage, for use, as it is claimed, either wholly or partially on lines not covered by the complainant’s mortgage, and fixtures on real estate covered by the mortgage to the [926]*926Morton Trust Company, but not covered by the complainant’s mortgage. We concur in the opinion of the court below (166 Fed. 569) that all this property is covered by the mortgage to the complainant except certain special work ori hand, being crossings, yokes, crossovers, turnouts, switches, etc., acquired solely for use on the Second avenue and Third avenue lines which the special master should not include in the property to be sold.

The other assignments of error concern questions of priority and distribution which cannot be determined, and we think were not intended to be determined, upon this record. In order to remove all doubt and to encourage the competition of persons not already interested in the premises, the decree will be modified by omitting- article IX and altering certain other articles as follows:

“II. That under an order made and filed herein on June 2, 1008, receivers’’ certificates to the amount of three million five hundred thousand dollars ($3,500,000) of principal, dated the 15th day of June, 1908, and payable one year from date, bearing interest at the rate of 5 per cent, per annum, payable semiannually, have been duly issued and are now outstanding and unpaid, and that said receivers’ certificates are secured by a lien upon all the property of the Metropolitan Street Railway Company prior to the lien of the said mortgage to the complainant and by a lien upon the property of the New York City Railway Company. Certain of the defendants claim that resort should be had to the property of the Metropolitan Street Railway Company, subject to the mortgage to the complainant and to the mortgage to the Morton Trust Company hereinafter referred to,, before resort is had to any other property for the payment of such certificates. And it is hereby ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the principal and interest of said receivers’ certificates be in the first instance paid out of the proceeds of sale hereby directed to be made, but with the rights and privileges of claiming exoneration, contribution, or repayment or other equitable relief more specifically conferred upon the Guaranty Trust Company as mortgagee by the seventh article hereof.”
“V. That an inventory shall be prepared by the special master and by him filed with the clerk of this court when and as directed by this court. This inventory will enumerate the rolling stock of the road in the possession of the receivers, stating the type and character of each item and giving its number. This inventory will also state the number and location of the various dynamos, transformers, and converters, and the number of horses. The inventory shall include such other articles of personal property in the possession of the receivers as in their opinion are of a value in excess of one hundred dollars each, and such additional articles as the special master shall think it wise to include. Such inventory and valuation shall be advisory only, and shall not, with respect to value or title or any other matter, be construed as a warranty, but all purchases shall be deemed to be made in reliance upon the purchaser’s own knowledge or information as to the property purchased. The property, both real and personal, hereby directed to be sold, may be inspected by intending bidders at the sale hereunder, subject to such reasonable regulations as the receivers may. prescribe.
“VI. That any purchaser of the property of the Metropolitan Street Railway Company at the sale hereby decreed may satisfy and make good the balance of his bid, above the sum required to be paid in cash, in whole or in j)art, by delivering to the special master appointed to conduct such sale bonds duly certified under the mortgage mentioned in paragraph I of this decree, or coupons thereto appertaining, or receivers’ certificates mentioned in paragraph II of this decree, which securities, unless gin negotiable form and payable to-bearer, shall be drily endorsed or assigned in blank. Such bonds, coupons, or receivers’ certificates, whether delivered to the said special master at the time of. sale or subsequently, shall be received at such price or value as shall be equivalent to the sum which would be payable out of the net proceeds of [927]*927such sale, if made for money, to the holder or holders of said bonds, coupons, or receivers’ certificates, for bis or their just, share or proportion in that character of such net proceeds, upon a due accounting and apportionment and distribution of such net proceeds. If there shall be realized on the sale and applied on the purchase price the entire amount due upon said bonds, coupons, or receivers’ certificates, then and in that case the said, bonds, coupons, and receivers’ certificates, or such of them as are so paid in full, shall be canceled and retained by the special master; provided, that when all said bonds and coupons issued under and secured by said mortgage and remaining unpaid shall he canceled and held by the special master, he may deliver them to the trustee of the mortgage securing the same, upon receiving a satisfaction thereof. But, if said entire amounts are not realized on the sale and applied upon the purchase price, the special master shall stamp or write upon each bond, coupon, or certificate the amount which is so applied, and also the amount of the deficiency remaining after such application, and shall return such bonds, coupons, and certificates to the purchaser or purchasers, from whom the same were received.
“VII. That the fund arising from the sale of the properties above directed to be .sold be applied as follows, namely: (1) To the payment of the costs of this cause and of all proper expenses attendant upon said sale or sales, Including the compensation of the special master appointed to make the sale, and to the payment also of all charges, compensations, allowances, and disbursements of the complainant and its solicitors and-counsel to the extent that said expenses, charges, compensations, allowances, and disbursements shall be allowed by this court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pennsylvania Steel Co. v. New York City Ry. Co.
194 F. 546 (S.D. New York, 1912)
Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. Waterbury
193 F. 44 (Second Circuit, 1911)
Pennsylvania Steel Co. v. New York City Ry. Co.
182 F. 155 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
177 F. 925, 101 C.C.A. 205, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 4437, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/guaranty-trust-co-of-new-york-v-metropolitan-st-ry-co-ca2-1910.