Grumbling v. Medallion Insurance Company
This text of 545 F.2d 686 (Grumbling v. Medallion Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
John R. GRUMBLING, Individually and as Personal
Representative of the Estate of Freida Mae
Grumbling, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
MEDALLION INSURANCE COMPANY, a Missouri Corporation,
Defendant-Appellant.
No. 75-2689.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Sept. 14, 1976.
James G. Breathouwer (argued), Bemis & Breathouwer, Portland, Or., for defendant-appellant.
Roger B. Todd (argued), Flaxel, Todd & Flaxel, North Bend, Or., for plaintiff-appellee.
Before TRASK and GOODWIN, Circuit Judges, and JAMESON,* District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
This case began as a diversity action brought in the district court by the plaintiff individually and as personal representative of his deceased wife's estate to recover the difference between judgments recovered in personal injury and wrongful death actions and the limits of liability under appellant's policy of liability insurance issued to appellee.
The trial court found for the appellee and entered its judgment in the amount of $107,497.27 plus interest, costs and an attorney's fee in the amount of $12,500.
We affirm on the basis of the opinion of the United States District Court for the District of Oregon which is reported at 392 F.Supp. 717 (D.Or.1975).
Judgment affirmed.
Honorable William J. Jameson, United States Senior District Judge for the District of Montana, sitting by designation
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
545 F.2d 686, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grumbling-v-medallion-insurance-company-ca9-1976.