Grumbling v. Medallion Insurance

Ninth Circuit

Grumbling v. Medallion Insurance

545 F.2d 686

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided September 14, 1976·No. No. 75-2689·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This case began as a diversity action brought in the district court by the plaintiff individually and as personal representative of his deceased wife’s estate to recover the difference between judgments recovered in personal injury and wrongful death actions and the limits of liability under appellant’s policy of liability insurance issued to appellee.

The trial court found for the appellee and entered its judgment in the amount of $107,497.27 plus interest, costs and an attorney’s fee in the amount of $12,500.

We affirm on the basis of the opinion of the United States District Court for the District of Oregon which is reported at 392 F.Supp. 717 (D.Or.1975).

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

This case began as a diversity action brought in the district court by the plaintiff individually and as personal representative of his deceased wife’s estate to recover the difference between judgments recovered in personal injury and wrongful death actions and the limits of liability under appellant’s policy of liability insurance issued to appellee.

The trial court found for the appellee and entered its judgment in the amount of $107,497.27 plus interest, costs and an attorney’s fee in the amount of $12,500.

We affirm on the basis of the opinion of the United States District Court for the District of Oregon which is reported at 392 F.Supp. 717 (D.Or.1975).

Judgment affirmed.

Grumbling v. Medallion Insurance, 545 F.2d 686 (9th Cir. 1976).

Pincite

545 F.2d 686 (Grumbling v. Medallion Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related