Grower v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad

77 N.Y.S. 1127

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide event, upon questions of law only'; the facts having been examined and no error found therein. Held, that plaintiff’s intestate was guilty of contributory negligence [1128] in not detecting- the approach of the defendant’s train.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grower v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad, 77 N.Y.S. 1127 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1902).

77 N.Y.S. 1127 (Grower v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Henavie v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.
59 N.E. 901 (New York Court of Appeals, 1901)
Seeley v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad
8 A.D. 402 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1896)