Groves v. Travelers Insurance

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Groves v. Travelers Insurance

552 S.E.2d 141, 354 N.C. 206, 2001 N.C. LEXIS 940

Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided October 5, 2001·No. No. 468A00·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

As to the issue of plaintiff’s claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of Judge McGee. Accordingly, we remand this case to the Court of Appeals for further remand to the Superior Court, Guilford County, for reinstatement of its order granting judgment on the pleadings in favor of defendants.

[207] REVERSED.

Justice EDMUNDS did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

As to the issue of plaintiff’s claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of Judge McGee. Accordingly, we remand this case to the Court of Appeals for further remand to the Superior Court, Guilford County, for reinstatement of its order granting judgment on the pleadings in favor of defendants.

[207] REVERSED.

Justice EDMUNDS did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Groves v. Travelers Insurance, 552 S.E.2d 141, 354 N.C. 206, 2001 N.C. LEXIS 940 (N.C. 2001).

Pincite

552 S.E.2d 141 (Groves v. Travelers Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related