Grote v. Rogers
149 A. 551, 158 Md. 695
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided March 13, 1930·No. [Nos. 29, 30, 31, January Term, 1930.]·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
A per curiam opinion was delivered as follows:
For the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the case of Sophie Grote v. Mrs. Charles Stanley Rogers, being No. 28 on the docket of the present term, the similar orders in the cases of Henry Grote, Helen Riddle and J. Frank Riddle, against the same appellee, being Eos. 29, 30 and 31, on the docket of the present term, and involving the same question, are hereby affirmed with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Grote v. Rogers, 149 A. 551, 158 Md. 695 (Md. 1930).
149 A. 551 (Grote v. Rogers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Employers' Liability Assurance Corp. v. Perkins
181 A. 436 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1935)