Home/Supreme Court/Grossman v. Kavanagh

Grossman v. Kavanagh

411 U.S. 914, 93 S. Ct. 1547, 36 L. Ed. 2d 315, 1973 U.S. LEXIS 2829
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedApril 2, 1973
DocketNo. 72-1084
StatusPublished
Cited by85 cases

This text of 411 U.S. 914 (Grossman v. Kavanagh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Grossman v. Kavanagh, 411 U.S. 914, 93 S. Ct. 1547, 36 L. Ed. 2d 315, 1973 U.S. LEXIS 2829 (1973).

Opinion

Motion for leave to file petition for writ of mandamus and/or prohibition denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Reynolds v. Giuliani
506 F.3d 183 (Second Circuit, 2007)
S & M BRANDS, INC. v. Summers
393 F. Supp. 2d 604 (M.D. Tennessee, 2005)
Smith v. Washington County
43 P.3d 1171 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2002)
Northwestern Title Loans, LLC v. Division of Finance & Corporate Securities
42 P.3d 313 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2002)
Brown v. Giuliani
158 F.R.D. 251 (E.D. New York, 1994)
Doe v. State
579 A.2d 37 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1990)
Envirotech Sanitary Systems, Inc. v. Shoener
745 F. Supp. 271 (M.D. Pennsylvania, 1990)
Guidice v. Jackson
726 F. Supp. 632 (E.D. Virginia, 1989)
Patricia Cotton v. Agnes M. Mansour
863 F.2d 1241 (Sixth Circuit, 1989)
Esparza v. Valdez
862 F.2d 788 (Tenth Circuit, 1988)
49 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 38,682, unempl.ins.rep. Cch 21,908 Maria Esparza, Eudesimo Arteaga, Reyes Nunez-Ortega, Bahman Zanjani, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Daniel Agonafer, Jose Sandoval, and Kazimierez Kozak, Consuelo Sandoval, Applicant for Joinder-Appellant v. Ruben Valdez, Executive Director, Colorado Department of Labor, John Kezer, Director, Division of Employment and Training, Industrial Commission of Colorado, (Ex-Officio the Unemployment Compensation Commission), in Their Official Capacities
862 F.2d 788 (Tenth Circuit, 1988)
Greco v. Tampa Wholesale Co.
522 So. 2d 506 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Griess v. State of Colorado
841 F.2d 1042 (Tenth Circuit, 1988)
Griess v. Colorado
841 F.2d 1042 (Tenth Circuit, 1988)
Shannon v. Bepko
684 F. Supp. 1465 (S.D. Indiana, 1988)
Circle Lanes of Fairfield, Inc. v. Fay
489 A.2d 363 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1985)
Rogers v. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities
489 A.2d 368 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1985)
Demery v. Kupperman
735 F.2d 1139 (Ninth Circuit, 1984)
Woodlake Heights Homeowners Ass'n v. Township of Middletown
7 N.J. Tax 364 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1984)
Klaips v. Bergland
715 F.2d 477 (Tenth Circuit, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
411 U.S. 914, 93 S. Ct. 1547, 36 L. Ed. 2d 315, 1973 U.S. LEXIS 2829, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grossman-v-kavanagh-scotus-1973.