Grossman v. Ardery

California Court of Appeal

Grossman v. Ardery

2 Cal. App. 2d 748

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedDecember 8, 1934

DocketCiv. No. 8291

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 2 Cal. App. 2d 748 (Grossman v. Ardery) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grossman v. Ardery, 2 Cal. App. 2d 748 (Cal. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

HOUSER, J.

The appeal herein is from a judgment by which a newspaper printed in the Spanish language and known as “El Heraldo de Mexico” was adjudicated a newspaper “of general circulation”, within the meaning and intent of the provisions of sections 4458 to 4465, inclusive, of the Political Code.

With the general exception that a comparatively small part of the newspaper in question was printed in the English language, to all intents and purposes the situation of the newspaper in regard to a compliance with the requirements [749]*749contained in the Constitution of this state and the statute to which reference hereinbefore has been had does not differ from that more particularset forth in the opinion this day filed in the Matter of L’ltalo-Americano, Civil No. 8290 (ante, p. 690 [38 Pac. (2d) 810]). Relying upon the decision in that ease as authority applicable to the facts herein, it is ordered that the judgment be, and it is, reversed.

Conrey, P. J., and York, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HOUSER, J.

The appeal herein is from a judgment by which a newspaper printed in the Spanish language and known as “El Heraldo de Mexico” was adjudicated a newspaper “of general circulation”, within the meaning and intent of the provisions of sections 4458 to 4465, inclusive, of the Political Code.

With the general exception that a comparatively small part of the newspaper in question was printed in the English language, to all intents and purposes the situation of the newspaper in regard to a compliance with the requirements [749]*749contained in the Constitution of this state and the statute to which reference hereinbefore has been had does not differ from that more particularset forth in the opinion this day filed in the Matter of L’ltalo-Americano, Civil No. 8290 (ante, p. 690 [38 Pac. (2d) 810]). Relying upon the decision in that ease as authority applicable to the facts herein, it is ordered that the judgment be, and it is, reversed.

Conrey, P. J., and York, J., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Cal. App. 2d 748, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grossman-v-ardery-calctapp-1934.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack