Gross v. Lockwood Folding Box Corp.

277 A.2d 359, 443 Pa. 159, 1971 Pa. LEXIS 894
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJune 1, 1971
DocketAppeals, Nos. 421 and 422
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 277 A.2d 359 (Gross v. Lockwood Folding Box Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gross v. Lockwood Folding Box Corp., 277 A.2d 359, 443 Pa. 159, 1971 Pa. LEXIS 894 (Pa. 1971).

Opinion

Opinion

per Curiam,

The jury verdicts in favor of one of four similarly situated plaintiffs and in favor of defendant with respect to the other three plaintiffs, two of whom suffered undisputed property damage, are inconsistent ver[161]*161diets justifying a new trial as to all. See Thompson v. Iannuzzi, 403 Pa. 329, 169 A. 2d 777 (1961); Pascarella v. Pgh. Rwys. Co., 389 Pa. 8, 131 A. 2d 445 (1957). See also Kessler v. Matlack, 210 Pa. Superior Ct. 450, 233 A. 2d 592 (1967).

Orders granting new trials affirmed.

Mr. Chief Justice Bell took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. Mr. Justice Cohen took no part in the decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McDermott v. Biddle
647 A.2d 514 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1994)
Walsh v. Pennsylvania Gas & Water Co.
449 A.2d 573 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1982)
Baldassari v. Baldassari
420 A.2d 556 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1980)
Commonwealth v. Cerulla
296 A.2d 858 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1972)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
277 A.2d 359, 443 Pa. 159, 1971 Pa. LEXIS 894, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gross-v-lockwood-folding-box-corp-pa-1971.