Gross v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Gross v. Commonwealth

149 S.W. 833, 149 Ky. 379, 1912 Ky. LEXIS 629

DecidedSeptember 19, 1912

StatusPublished

This text of 149 S.W. 833 (Gross v. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gross v. Commonwealth, 149 S.W. 833, 149 Ky. 379, 1912 Ky. LEXIS 629 (Ky. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by Chief

Justice Hobson

Sustaining motion to docket as one appeal.

The four appellants were jointly indicted for murder and a separate trial not being demanded, were tried jointly. They were all found guilty of voluntary manslaughter, and judgment was entered upon the verdict. They have prosecuted a joint appeal and the question is raised whether they must each pay a tax of $2.00 on the appeal. "We are of the opinion that they may jointly appeal, as they were indicted and tried jointly, and that, therefore, only one tax of $2.00 should he paid.

Motion sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by Chief

Justice Hobson

Sustaining motion to docket as one appeal.

The four appellants were jointly indicted for murder and a separate trial not being demanded, were tried jointly. They were all found guilty of voluntary manslaughter, and judgment was entered upon the verdict. They have prosecuted a joint appeal and the question is raised whether they must each pay a tax of $2.00 on the appeal. "We are of the opinion that they may jointly appeal, as they were indicted and tried jointly, and that, therefore, only one tax of $2.00 should he paid.

Motion sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

149 S.W. 833, 149 Ky. 379, 1912 Ky. LEXIS 629, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gross-v-commonwealth-kyctapp-1912.