Gross Plumbing & Rubber Co. v. United States

61 Cust. Ct. 653, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1732
United States Customs Court·Decided October 7, 1968·No. No. P68/426; protests 62/6437, etc. (Philadelphia)·Published

Opinion

Rao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items marked “A”, “B”, or “C” covered by the foregoing protests consist of nozzles or garden hose accessories (so-called drainmasters, drains or fan sprays) chiefly used in and around family dwellings for household purposes, each item being attached to the end of a garden hose in the same manner as the nozzles the subject of United States v. Lipman's (52 CCPA 59, C.A.D. 859); that the items marked “D” consist [654]*654of adaptors chiefly used in and around family dwellings for household purposes, each item being easily attached to and detached from a faucet in the same way as the aerators the subject of Globe Importing Company v. United States (47 Cust. Ct. 248, Abstract 65882); that the items marked “A” and “D” are in.chief value of brass; that the items marked “B” are in chief value of zinc; and that the items marked “0” are in chief value of steel, the claims of the plaintiffs were sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gross Plumbing & Rubber Co. v. United States, 61 Cust. Ct. 653, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1732 (cusc 1968).

61 Cust. Ct. 653 (Gross Plumbing & Rubber Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Globe Importing Co. v. United States
47 Cust. Ct. 248 (U.S. Customs Court, 1961)