Gross Plumbing & Rubber Co. v. United States
This text of 60 Cust. Ct. 1012 (Gross Plumbing & Rubber Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of flat sink strainers and replacement cup sink strainers in chief value of brass the same in all material respects as those the subject of Davies, Turner & Company v. United States (55 Cust. Ct. 488, Abstract 69651), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
60 Cust. Ct. 1012, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2813, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gross-plumbing-rubber-co-v-united-states-cusc-1968.