Groover, Conoly & Davis v. Melton
58 S.E. 488, 2 Ga. App. 269, 1907 Ga. App. LEXIS 342
Opinion
This case is controlled by the decisions of the Supreme Court in the cases of Harris v. Kittle, 119 Ga. 30 (2), 45 S. E. 72, McCrory v. Hall, 104 Ga. 666, 30 S. E. 881, Smith v. Brown, 96 Ga. 274, 23 S. E. 849, New Eng. Mge. Co. v. Watson, 99 Ga. 733, 27 S. E. 160, and Baker v. Aultman, 107 Ga. 339, 33 S. E. 423, 73 Am. St. R. 132, holding that some overt act of constructive seizure by the levying officer is essential to the validity of the levy of an attachment upon real estate. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Groover, Conoly & Davis v. Melton, 58 S.E. 488, 2 Ga. App. 269, 1907 Ga. App. LEXIS 342 (Ga. Ct. App. 1907).
58 S.E. 488 (Groover, Conoly & Davis v. Melton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Oliver v. Parramore
18 S.E.2d 562 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1942)
Lane v. Bradfield
140 S.E. 417 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1927)
United Provisions Corp. v. Board of Missions
124 S.E. 820 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1924)