Groff v. Groff

3 N.J.L. 657

Opinion

By the Court.

It is marked on the back by the justice, “plaintiff’s state of demand;” that is sufficient to designate it.

2d. It was then contended that the action was brought by an infant, and the process sued out in his own name, without a guardian or prochein ami.

[f]

By the Court.

It is the common practice; it is sufficient if the guardian or prochein ami is appointed before declaration; and this has been regularly done in both cases.

Let judgment be affirmed.