Groff v. Groff

3 N.J.L. 656

Opinion

By the Court.

— It is marked on the back by the justice, “plaintiff’s state of demand”; that is sufficient to designate it.

2d. It was then contended that the action was brought by an infant, and the process sued out in his own name, without a guardian or prochein amy.

[*] By the Court.

— It is the common practice; it is sufficient if the guardian or prochein amy is appointed before declaration; and this has been regularly done in both cases.

Let judgment be affirmed.