Groff v. Groff

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Groff v. Groff

3 N.J.L. 656

DecidedMay 15, 1810

StatusPublished

This text of 3 N.J.L. 656 (Groff v. Groff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Groff v. Groff, 3 N.J.L. 656 (N.J. 1810).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court.

— It is marked on the back by the justice, “plaintiff’s state of demand”; that is sufficient to designate it.

2d. It was then contended that the action was brought by an infant, and the process sued out in his own name, without a guardian or prochein amy.

[*] By the Court.

— It is the common practice; it is sufficient if the guardian or prochein amy is appointed before declaration; and this has been regularly done in both cases.

Let judgment be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court.

— It is marked on the back by the justice, “plaintiff’s state of demand”; that is sufficient to designate it.

2d. It was then contended that the action was brought by an infant, and the process sued out in his own name, without a guardian or prochein amy.

[*] By the Court.

— It is the common practice; it is sufficient if the guardian or prochein amy is appointed before declaration; and this has been regularly done in both cases.

Let judgment be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 N.J.L. 656, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/groff-v-groff-nj-1810.