Grizzle v. PENSKE LOGISTICS, INC.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Grizzle v. PENSKE LOGISTICS, INC.

174 S.W.3d 77, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1590, 2005 WL 2746468

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 25, 2005·No. ED 86110·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Daniel Grizzle (Appellant) appeals from a judgment of the trial court entered upon a jury verdict finding in favor of Penske Logistics, Inc. on Appellant’s wrongful discharge claim. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that there was no error at the trial court level. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Daniel Grizzle (Appellant) appeals from a judgment of the trial court entered upon a jury verdict finding in favor of Penske Logistics, Inc. on Appellant’s wrongful discharge claim. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that there was no error at the trial court level. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Grizzle v. PENSKE LOGISTICS, INC., 174 S.W.3d 77, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1590, 2005 WL 2746468 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

174 S.W.3d 77 (Grizzle v. PENSKE LOGISTICS, INC.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related