Grizzle v. PENSKE LOGISTICS, INC.
This text of 174 S.W.3d 77 (Grizzle v. PENSKE LOGISTICS, INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Daniel Grizzle (Appellant) appeals from a judgment of the trial court entered upon a jury verdict finding in favor of Penske Logistics, Inc. on Appellant’s wrongful discharge claim. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that there was no error at the trial court level. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
174 S.W.3d 77, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1590, 2005 WL 2746468, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grizzle-v-penske-logistics-inc-moctapp-2005.