Culpepper v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Culpepper v. State

174 S.W.3d 77, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1562, 2005 WL 2746400

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 25, 2005

DocketED 85447

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 174 S.W.3d 77 (Culpepper v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Culpepper v. State, 174 S.W.3d 77, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1562, 2005 WL 2746400 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, John Culpepper, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, movant argues that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to object to certain statements made by the prosecutor during closing argument.

The motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, John Culpepper, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, movant argues that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to object to certain statements made by the prosecutor during closing argument.

The motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

174 S.W.3d 77, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1562, 2005 WL 2746400, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/culpepper-v-state-moctapp-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack