Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Grimm v. City of Buffalo

Grimm v. City of Buffalo

8 A.D.2d 589, 183 N.Y.S.2d 579, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9510
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Grimm v. City of Buffalo. Read the opinion of the Court — 8 A.D.2d 689 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 20, 1959·Published

Opinion

Order affirmed, without costs of this appeal to any party. (See Per Curiam opinion filed in companion case of Baldwin v. City of Buffalo, 7 A D 2d 386.) Memorandum: The Corporation Counsel conceded upon the argument of this appeal that if the complaint in the companion action is legally sufficient, the order of Special Term denying the motion to dismiss the petition in this article 78 proceeding relating to the change in the couneilmanic district boundaries should be affirmed. All concur. (Appeal from an order of Erie Special Term denying a motion by defendants Manguso, Cooley and the City of Buffalo for a dismissal of petitioner’s petition.) Present — McCum, P. J., Kimball, Williams, Bastow and Goldman, JJ. [15 Misc 2d 607.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grimm v. City of Buffalo, 8 A.D.2d 589, 183 N.Y.S.2d 579, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9510 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

8 A.D.2d 589 (Grimm v. City of Buffalo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Baldwin v. City of Buffalo
15 Misc. 2d 607 (New York Supreme Court, 1959)