Grimm v. City of Buffalo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Grimm v. City of Buffalo

8 A.D.2d 589, 183 N.Y.S.2d 579, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9510

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 20, 1959

StatusPublished

This text of 8 A.D.2d 589 (Grimm v. City of Buffalo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grimm v. City of Buffalo, 8 A.D.2d 589, 183 N.Y.S.2d 579, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9510 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

Order affirmed, without costs of this appeal to any party. (See Per Curiam opinion filed in companion case of Baldwin v. City of Buffalo, 7 A D 2d 386.) Memorandum: The Corporation Counsel conceded upon the argument of this appeal that if the complaint in the companion action is legally sufficient, the order of Special Term denying the motion to dismiss the petition in this article 78 proceeding relating to the change in the couneilmanic district boundaries should be affirmed. All concur. (Appeal from an order of Erie Special Term denying a motion by defendants Manguso, Cooley and the City of Buffalo for a dismissal of petitioner’s petition.) Present — McCum, P. J., Kimball, Williams, Bastow and Goldman, JJ. [15 Misc 2d 607.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed, without costs of this appeal to any party. (See Per Curiam opinion filed in companion case of Baldwin v. City of Buffalo, 7 A D 2d 386.) Memorandum: The Corporation Counsel conceded upon the argument of this appeal that if the complaint in the companion action is legally sufficient, the order of Special Term denying the motion to dismiss the petition in this article 78 proceeding relating to the change in the couneilmanic district boundaries should be affirmed. All concur. (Appeal from an order of Erie Special Term denying a motion by defendants Manguso, Cooley and the City of Buffalo for a dismissal of petitioner’s petition.) Present — McCum, P. J., Kimball, Williams, Bastow and Goldman, JJ. [15 Misc 2d 607.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 A.D.2d 589, 183 N.Y.S.2d 579, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9510, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grimm-v-city-of-buffalo-nyappdiv-1959.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack