Grillo v. Szarka, No. Cv 94 55492 S (Nov. 22, 1994)

Connecticut Superior Court

Grillo v. Szarka, No. Cv 94 55492 S (Nov. 22, 1994)

1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 11733

Connecticut Superior Court·Decided November 22, 1994·No. No. CV 94 55492 S·Unpublished

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION The defendant is correct in that the summons and complaint were not served within thirty days of the denial of the prejudgment remedy. Connecticut General Statutes § 52-278j(b). The application is considered withdrawn and the recognizance/bond that is part of it is also considered withdrawn.

Accordingly, the motion to dismiss is granted.

Rittenband, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION The defendant is correct in that the summons and complaint were not served within thirty days of the denial of the prejudgment remedy. Connecticut General Statutes § 52-278j(b). The application is considered withdrawn and the recognizance/bond that is part of it is also considered withdrawn.

Accordingly, the motion to dismiss is granted.

Rittenband, J.

Grillo v. Szarka, No. Cv 94 55492 S (Nov. 22, 1994), 1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 11733 (Colo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 11733 (Grillo v. Szarka, No. Cv 94 55492 S (Nov. 22, 1994)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related