Home/Connecticut Superior Court/Grillo v. Szarka, No. Cv 94 55492 S (Nov. 22, 1994)

Grillo v. Szarka, No. Cv 94 55492 S (Nov. 22, 1994)

1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 11733
CourtConnecticut Superior Court
DecidedNovember 22, 1994
DocketNo. CV 94 55492 S
StatusUnpublished

This text of 1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 11733 (Grillo v. Szarka, No. Cv 94 55492 S (Nov. 22, 1994)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Grillo v. Szarka, No. Cv 94 55492 S (Nov. 22, 1994), 1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 11733 (Colo. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION The defendant is correct in that the summons and complaint were not served within thirty days of the denial of the prejudgment remedy. Connecticut General Statutes § 52-278j(b). The application is considered withdrawn and the recognizance/bond that is part of it is also considered withdrawn.

Accordingly, the motion to dismiss is granted.

Rittenband, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 52-278j
Connecticut § 52-278j(b)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 11733, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grillo-v-szarka-no-cv-94-55492-s-nov-22-1994-connsuperct-1994.